<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remedy Decision Released in the Lund v. Boissoin Case</title>
	<link>http://ablawg.ca/2008/06/18/remedy-decision-released-in-the-lund-v-boissoin-case/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Court of Queen’s Bench Overturns Panel Decision in Boissoin v. Lund</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2008/06/18/remedy-decision-released-in-the-lund-v-boissoin-case/#comment-80415</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Court of Queen’s Bench Overturns Panel Decision in Boissoin v. Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2008/06/18/remedy-decision-released-in-the-lund-v-boissoin-case/#comment-80415</guid>
		<description>[...] Justice Earl Wilson of the Alberta Court of Queen&#8217;s Bench recently overturned the Human Rights Panel decision, which found that Mr. Stephen Boissoin and the Concerned Christian Coalition Inc. had, in a letter to the editor of a newspaper published June 17, 2002, expressed comments likely to expose gay persons to hatred and/or contempt due to their sexual orientation. See my earlier ABlawg posts on the Panel decision and the remedy decision. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Justice Earl Wilson of the Alberta Court of Queen&#8217;s Bench recently overturned the Human Rights Panel decision, which found that Mr. Stephen Boissoin and the Concerned Christian Coalition Inc. had, in a letter to the editor of a newspaper published June 17, 2002, expressed comments likely to expose gay persons to hatred and/or contempt due to their sexual orientation. See my earlier ABlawg posts on the Panel decision and the remedy decision. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alberta’s Hate Speech Law Under Challenge</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2008/06/18/remedy-decision-released-in-the-lund-v-boissoin-case/#comment-71516</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alberta’s Hate Speech Law Under Challenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2008/06/18/remedy-decision-released-in-the-lund-v-boissoin-case/#comment-71516</guid>
		<description>[...] Boissoin on ABlawg (see Offensive Publication Case Highlights the Tension Between Human Rights and Civil Liberties and Remedy Decision Released in the Lund v. Boissoin Case). The case involves a complaint made under section 3 of the HRCMA by Darren Lund against Stephen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Boissoin on ABlawg (see Offensive Publication Case Highlights the Tension Between Human Rights and Civil Liberties and Remedy Decision Released in the Lund v. Boissoin Case). The case involves a complaint made under section 3 of the HRCMA by Darren Lund against Stephen [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
