<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is a non-operator entitled to a constructive trust over the operator’s own assets?</title>
	<link>http://ablawg.ca/2008/10/11/when-is-a-non-operator-entitled-to-a-constructive-trust-over-the-operator%e2%80%99s-own-assets/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Court of Appeal rejects the constructive trust analysis in Brookfield</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2008/10/11/when-is-a-non-operator-entitled-to-a-constructive-trust-over-the-operator%e2%80%99s-own-assets/#comment-64762</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Court of Appeal rejects the constructive trust analysis in Brookfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2008/10/11/when-is-a-non-operator-entitled-to-a-constructive-trust-over-the-operator%e2%80%99s-own-assets/#comment-64762</guid>
		<description>[...] had criticized the trial judgement in an earlier post on two main grounds. The first ground was that in deciding to impose a constructive trust Justice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] had criticized the trial judgement in an earlier post on two main grounds. The first ground was that in deciding to impose a constructive trust Justice [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Extraordinary times justify extraordinary remedies: interim measures under the AIPN standard form operating agreement</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2008/10/11/when-is-a-non-operator-entitled-to-a-constructive-trust-over-the-operator%e2%80%99s-own-assets/#comment-57563</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Extraordinary times justify extraordinary remedies: interim measures under the AIPN standard form operating agreement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2008/10/11/when-is-a-non-operator-entitled-to-a-constructive-trust-over-the-operator%e2%80%99s-own-assets/#comment-57563</guid>
		<description>[...] not be surprising if tough times in the oilpatch and concerns about commingling operators (see my blog of Brookfield Bridge Lending Fund Inc. v. Vanquish Oil and Gas Corporation, 2008 ABQB 444) trigger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] not be surprising if tough times in the oilpatch and concerns about commingling operators (see my blog of Brookfield Bridge Lending Fund Inc. v. Vanquish Oil and Gas Corporation, 2008 ABQB 444) trigger [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
