<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Environmental Private Prosecution Update: John Custer v. Syncrude Canada</title>
	<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/01/09/environmental-private-prosecution-update-john-custer-v-syncrude-canada/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 (or was that 1600) Dead Ducks</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/01/09/environmental-private-prosecution-update-john-custer-v-syncrude-canada/#comment-71116</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 (or was that 1600) Dead Ducks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/01/09/environmental-private-prosecution-update-john-custer-v-syncrude-canada/#comment-71116</guid>
		<description>[...] 2009 (see previous posts by myself (R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks and Environmental Private Prosecution Update: John Custer v. Syncrude Canada) and Jocelyn Stacey (Lame duck constitutional arguments: a new twist on Syncrude’s Tailings Pond [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 2009 (see previous posts by myself (R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks and Environmental Private Prosecution Update: John Custer v. Syncrude Canada) and Jocelyn Stacey (Lame duck constitutional arguments: a new twist on Syncrude’s Tailings Pond [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/01/09/environmental-private-prosecution-update-john-custer-v-syncrude-canada/#comment-50280</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/01/09/environmental-private-prosecution-update-john-custer-v-syncrude-canada/#comment-50280</guid>
		<description>[...] Environment Canada has charged Syncrude for violating section 5.1 of the Migratory Birds Convention Act, S.C. 1994, c. 22 by depositing substances harmful to migratory birds in its tailing pond. This is the same information as sworn by John Custer in his private prosecution that commenced in January (See my earlier post Environmental Private Prosecution Update: John Custer v. Syncrude Canada). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Environment Canada has charged Syncrude for violating section 5.1 of the Migratory Birds Convention Act, S.C. 1994, c. 22 by depositing substances harmful to migratory birds in its tailing pond. This is the same information as sworn by John Custer in his private prosecution that commenced in January (See my earlier post Environmental Private Prosecution Update: John Custer v. Syncrude Canada). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/01/09/environmental-private-prosecution-update-john-custer-v-syncrude-canada/#comment-49897</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/01/09/environmental-private-prosecution-update-john-custer-v-syncrude-canada/#comment-49897</guid>
		<description>[...] Environment Canada has charged Syncrude for violating section 5.1 of the Migratory Birds Convention Act, S.C. 1994, c. 22 by depositing substances harmful to migratory birds in its tailing pond. This is the same information as sworn by John Custer in his private prosecution that commenced in January (See my earlier post Environmental Private Prosecution Update: John Custer v. Syncrude Canada).  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Environment Canada has charged Syncrude for violating section 5.1 of the Migratory Birds Convention Act, S.C. 1994, c. 22 by depositing substances harmful to migratory birds in its tailing pond. This is the same information as sworn by John Custer in his private prosecution that commenced in January (See my earlier post Environmental Private Prosecution Update: John Custer v. Syncrude Canada).  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

