<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks</title>
	<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/02/23/r-v-syncrude-canada-the-case-of-the-500-dead-ducks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 (or was that 1600) Dead Ducks</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/02/23/r-v-syncrude-canada-the-case-of-the-500-dead-ducks/#comment-71108</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 (or was that 1600) Dead Ducks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/02/23/r-v-syncrude-canada-the-case-of-the-500-dead-ducks/#comment-71108</guid>
		<description>[...] has followed this regulatory saga from its inception in January 2009 (see previous posts by myself (R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks and Environmental Private Prosecution Update: John Custer v. Syncrude Canada) and Jocelyn Stacey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has followed this regulatory saga from its inception in January 2009 (see previous posts by myself (R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks and Environmental Private Prosecution Update: John Custer v. Syncrude Canada) and Jocelyn Stacey [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lame duck constitutional arguments: a new twist on Syncrude’s Tailings Pond Debacle</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/02/23/r-v-syncrude-canada-the-case-of-the-500-dead-ducks/#comment-65184</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lame duck constitutional arguments: a new twist on Syncrude’s Tailings Pond Debacle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/02/23/r-v-syncrude-canada-the-case-of-the-500-dead-ducks/#comment-65184</guid>
		<description>[...] dead duck saga continues. In a previous post on ABlawg (R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks), Shaun Fluker left off with the words &#8220;stay tuned&#8221;. Stay tuned, indeed. As it turns [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] dead duck saga continues. In a previous post on ABlawg (R. v. Syncrude Canada: The Case of The 500 Dead Ducks), Shaun Fluker left off with the words &#8220;stay tuned&#8221;. Stay tuned, indeed. As it turns [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

