<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security Trumps Freedom of Religion for Hutterite Drivers</title>
	<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/08/10/security-trumps-freedom-of-religion-for-hutterite-drivers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Motion for Re-hearing of Hutterian Brethren Case Dismissed by Supreme Court of Canada</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/08/10/security-trumps-freedom-of-religion-for-hutterite-drivers/#comment-74443</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Motion for Re-hearing of Hutterian Brethren Case Dismissed by Supreme Court of Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/08/10/security-trumps-freedom-of-religion-for-hutterite-drivers/#comment-74443</guid>
		<description>[...] majority&#8217;s seeming retreat from the duty to accommodate in this case (see my previous post Security Trumps Freedom of Religion for Hutterite Drivers on this point). Even if we think of the government&#8217;s obligations in terms of &#8220;minimally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] majority&#8217;s seeming retreat from the duty to accommodate in this case (see my previous post Security Trumps Freedom of Religion for Hutterite Drivers on this point). Even if we think of the government&#8217;s obligations in terms of &#8220;minimally [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

