<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alberta’s Hate Speech Law Under Challenge</title>
	<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/09/21/alberta%e2%80%99s-hate-speech-law-under-challenge/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Court upholds Alberta’s Hate Speech Law</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/09/21/alberta%e2%80%99s-hate-speech-law-under-challenge/#comment-77933</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Court upholds Alberta’s Hate Speech Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/09/21/alberta%e2%80%99s-hate-speech-law-under-challenge/#comment-77933</guid>
		<description>[...] v. Lund, 2009 ABQB 592 (a link to the case will be added once available)Back in September, I predicted the failure of a constitutional challenge to Alberta&#8217;s hate speech law, section 3 of the Human [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] v. Lund, 2009 ABQB 592 (a link to the case will be added once available)Back in September, I predicted the failure of a constitutional challenge to Alberta&#8217;s hate speech law, section 3 of the Human [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Shandro</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/09/21/alberta%e2%80%99s-hate-speech-law-under-challenge/#comment-77710</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Shandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/09/21/alberta%e2%80%99s-hate-speech-law-under-challenge/#comment-77710</guid>
		<description>Here's a link to Justice Wilson's decision of December 3, 2009: http://is.gd/5cmOL

To help readers regarding Penny's comment, above, the Court determined that the panel erred in making the connection between the letter and the assault on the teenager (at para. 69).

I look forward to Professor Koshan's analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a link to Justice Wilson&#8217;s decision of December 3, 2009: <a href="http://is.gd/5cmOL" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/5cmOL</a></p>
<p>To help readers regarding Penny&#8217;s comment, above, the Court determined that the panel erred in making the connection between the letter and the assault on the teenager (at para. 69).</p>
<p>I look forward to Professor Koshan&#8217;s analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penney Kome</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/09/21/alberta%e2%80%99s-hate-speech-law-under-challenge/#comment-74187</link>
		<dc:creator>Penney Kome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/09/21/alberta%e2%80%99s-hate-speech-law-under-challenge/#comment-74187</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that the AHRC decision found a very direct link between the views that Stephen Boisson expressed, both in his letter and also in his work with Red Deer youth, and the serious injury that one of the youth in his youth group inflicted on another youth who was deemed to appear too effeminate. In other words, at least one witness made a direct connection between Boisson's declaration of a war on homosexuals, and a violent act of what can only be called "gay bashing". If that's not hate speech, I don't know what is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that the AHRC decision found a very direct link between the views that Stephen Boisson expressed, both in his letter and also in his work with Red Deer youth, and the serious injury that one of the youth in his youth group inflicted on another youth who was deemed to appear too effeminate. In other words, at least one witness made a direct connection between Boisson&#8217;s declaration of a war on homosexuals, and a violent act of what can only be called &#8220;gay bashing&#8221;. If that&#8217;s not hate speech, I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AB Law Blog Doesn&#8217;t Get It Much Either &#171; The Lynch Mob</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/09/21/alberta%e2%80%99s-hate-speech-law-under-challenge/#comment-71615</link>
		<dc:creator>AB Law Blog Doesn&#8217;t Get It Much Either &#171; The Lynch Mob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/09/21/alberta%e2%80%99s-hate-speech-law-under-challenge/#comment-71615</guid>
		<description>[...] of Calgary Faculty of Law, this one written by Jennifer Koshan of the faculty entitled &#8220;Alberta&#8217;s Hate Speech Law Under Challenge&#8220;. Frankly, I expected better, and not a political pronouncement. It was a disappointment to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of Calgary Faculty of Law, this one written by Jennifer Koshan of the faculty entitled &#8220;Alberta&#8217;s Hate Speech Law Under Challenge&#8220;. Frankly, I expected better, and not a political pronouncement. It was a disappointment to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

