Comments on: “The proof of the pudding is in the eating” that litigation is not the best way to quantify interim costs. http://ablawg.ca/2012/01/11/%e2%80%9cthe-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating%e2%80%9d-that-litigation-is-not-the-best-way-to-quantify-interim-costs/ Tue, 22 May 2012 10:11:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: David Laidlaw http://ablawg.ca/2012/01/11/%e2%80%9cthe-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating%e2%80%9d-that-litigation-is-not-the-best-way-to-quantify-interim-costs/#comment-207674 David Laidlaw Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:45:38 +0000 http://ablawg.ca/2012/01/11/%e2%80%9cthe-proof-of-the-pudding-is-in-the-eating%e2%80%9d-that-litigation-is-not-the-best-way-to-quantify-interim-costs/#comment-207674 Perhaps a Rule Change to allow the Taxing Officer to set the interim costs on a referral from the Court? There is a provision in the Court of Queen's Bench Act, s. 11 to allow a reference to the Masters by a judge. My experience has been that this is a little used provision however. Perhaps a Rule Change to allow the Taxing Officer to set the interim costs on a referral from the Court?

There is a provision in the Court of Queen’s Bench Act, s. 11 to allow a reference to the Masters by a judge. My experience has been that this is a little used provision however.

]]>