Cases Considered
Links
Other Blogs
Recent Comments
- Linda McKay-Panos on One Person, Two Universities, Three Alberta Cases
- Susan Wright on The Role of the “Noble Savage” in Environmental Social Activism
- Matt Langer on Section 19 of the Perpetuities Act and the oil and gas lease as a fee simple determinable estate of a profit à prendre
- Jennifer Koshan on Condominiums, Caregivers and Human Rights
- J.S. on Managed property, the reserve fund, ultra vires doctrine and other issues in interpreting the Condominium Property Act
Contributors
- Admin
- Alastair Lucas, Q.C.
- Alastair MacKinnon
- Alice Woolley
- Allan Ingelson
- Amanda Winters
- Ana Maria Radu
- Anne Stalker
- Arlene Blake
- Arlene Kwasniak
- Astrid Kalkbrenner
- Ben Seward
- Brett Code, Q.C.
- Brian Seaman
- Bryce Tingle
- Carmen Gustafson
- Carol Burgess
- Cliff Shaw, Q.C.
- Colleen Ma
- David Corry
- David Laidlaw
- Donald MacCannell
- Dorab Colah
- Doug Rae
- Elizabeth Whitsitt
- Emma McAuliffe
- Geoff Ellwand
- Greg Francis
- Greg Hagen
- Heather Beyko
- Ian Holloway
- Jassmine Girgis
- Jeff Bone
- Jennifer Koshan
- Jocelyn Stacey
- Jonnette Watson Hamilton
- Joshua Selby
- Kathleen Ganley
- Kathleen Mahoney
- Kristy Williams
- Kristyn Stevens
- Linda McKay-Panos
- Martin Kay Q.C.
- Martin Kratz
- Matthew Ducharme
- Maureen Duffy
- Melissa Luhtanen
- Michael Ilg
- Nelson Medeiros
- Nicholas Rafferty
- Nickie Vlavianos
- Nigel Bankes
- Ola Malik
- Orlagh O'Kelly
- Rob Omura
- Scott Leigh
- Shaun Fluker
- Theresa Yurkewich
- TUCFA
- Will Randall
- William Donahue
Categories
Archives
Contact ABlawg
Controls
Category Archives: Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court
Getting Foreclosure Practice Right: Some Regulatory Suggestions
PDF version: Getting Foreclosure Practice Right: Some Regulatory Suggestions Case commented on: AGF Trust Company v Soos, 2012 ABQB 747 AGF Trust Company v Soos is a decision by Master Lorne Smart, reviewing a Bill of Costs in a standard … Continue reading
Refining Vexatious Litigant and Vexatious Spokesperson Jurisprudence
Case considered: Allen v Gray, 2012 ABQB 66 PDF version: Refining Vexatious Litigant and Vexatious Spokesperson Jurisprudence Alberta’s new vexatious litigant provisions have been in force for almost five years now and a useful body of precedent has been developed. Novel points … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court
1 Comment
Waiver of Dispute Resolution under the New Rules
PDF version: Waiver of Dispute Resolution under the New Rules Case considered: IBM Canada Limited v Kossovan, 2011 ABQB 621. In IBM Canada Limited v Kossovan, Mr. Justice Bryan E. Mahoney provided the first judicial interpretation of an important new … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court
1 Comment
Third Edition of the JSS Barristers Rules
As noted in previous posts, in its newsletter titled JSS Barristers Rules JSS Barristers provides summaries of cases considering the new Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010. Issue 3 of the Newsletter and updated Cumulative Summary are now available … Continue reading
Second edition of JSS Barristers Rules now available
As noted in a previous post, JSS Barristers is providing summaries of cases considering the new Alberta Rules of Court, Alta. Reg. 124/2010, in a newsletter called JSS Barristers Rules. The second edition of the newsletter is available here. Of … Continue reading
JSS Barristers and The New Rules of Court
ABlawg readers may have noticed that we have not posted any comments lately on the new Alberta Rules of Court, Alta. Reg. 124/2010. We have decided to leave that task to our colleagues at JSS Barristers, who released the first … Continue reading
New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 5.41 and Medical Examinations
Case commented on: Nystrom v. Ranson, 2011 ABQB 116 The Plaintiff alleged physical injuries resulting from a motor vehicle accident. He claimed that his physical injuries limited his present and future vocational options and claimed past and future lost income. … Continue reading
New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 13.7 and Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Case commented on: Terrace Consulting Inc. v. Jackson, 2011 ABQB 108 The Plaintiff applied for summary judgment to enforce its remedies under an offer to purchase a condominium. The Defendants alleged misrepresentation and contended that they were told they were … Continue reading
New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 1.2, The Purpose and Intent of the Rules and Rule 15.12, Transitional
Case commented on: Lameman v Alberta, 2011 ABQB 40 Alberta and Canada brought applications under the old Rules to strike the plaintiffs’ statement of claim in the summer of 2009. The matter has been in case management for over two … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court
1 Comment
New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 2.10 and Intervenor Status
Case commented on: R. v. Hirsekorn, 2011 ABQB 156 R. v. Hirsekorn is a summary conviction appeal of convictions for shooting wildlife not in regular season and being in possession of wildlife without a valid permit, contrary to ss. 25(1) … Continue reading


