-
Recent Posts
Contributors
Categories
Author Archives: Jennifer Koshan
Judging Sexual Assault Cases Free of Myths and Stereotypes
By: Jennifer Koshan PDF Version: Judging Sexual Assault Cases Free of Myths and Stereotypes Case Commented On: R v Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 (CanLII) I am spending the fall term at the University of Kent’s Centre for Law, Gender and … Continue reading
Posted in Criminal, State Responses to Violence
4 Comments
Is There a Right to Private Health Care in Alberta? A “Constitutional Vivisection”
By: Jennifer Koshan PDF Version: Is There a Right to Private Health Care in Alberta? A “Constitutional Vivisection” Case Commented On: Allen v Alberta, 2015 ABCA 277 To what extent do precedents in constitutional cases allow litigants to take short … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional
1 Comment
New Developments on the Test for Discrimination Under Human Rights Legislation: Time for Rehab?
By: Jennifer Koshan PDF Version: New Developments on the Test for Discrimination Under Human Rights Legislation: Time for Rehab? Cases Commented On: Stewart v Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2015 ABCA 225, Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des … Continue reading
Posted in Human Rights
2 Comments
Blogging and Legal Education
By: Jennifer Koshan PDF Version: Blogging and Legal Education I was at the Canadian Association of Law Teachers (CALT) conference in Ottawa earlier this week and participated in a roundtable on blogging and legal education. Other participants included University of … Continue reading
Posted in Blogs and Websites, Legal Education
1 Comment
The Supreme Court’s Latest Equality Rights Decision: An Emphasis on Arbitrariness
By: Jennifer Koshan and Jonnette Watson Hamilton PDF Version: The Supreme Court’s Latest Equality Rights Decision: An Emphasis on Arbitrariness Case Commented On: Kahkewistahaw First Nation v Taypotat, 2015 SCC 30 (CanLII) The Supreme Court released its decision in Kahkewistahaw … Continue reading
Posted in Aboriginal, Constitutional
Comments Off on The Supreme Court’s Latest Equality Rights Decision: An Emphasis on Arbitrariness