Category Archives: Aboriginal

New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 2.10 and Intervenor Status

Case commented on: R. v. Hirsekorn, 2011 ABQB 156 R. v. Hirsekorn is a summary conviction appeal of convictions for shooting wildlife not in regular season and being in possession of wildlife without a valid permit, contrary to ss. 25(1) … Continue reading

Posted in Aboriginal, Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court | Comments Off on New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 2.10 and Intervenor Status

The world wide web and the honour of the Crown

PDF version: The world wide web and the honour of the Crown  Cases considered: Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta (Minister of Energy), 2011 ABCA 29, and Lameman v Alberta, 2011 ABQB 40 The Court of Appeal (Justices Ritter, Bielby … Continue reading

Posted in Aboriginal | 1 Comment

Interpreting Section 15(2) of the Charter: LEAF’s Intervention in Alberta (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development) v Cunningham

By: Jonnette Watson Hamilton PDF Version: Interpreting Section 15(2) of the Charter: LEAF’s Intervention in Alberta (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development) v Cunningham  Cases Commented On: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs … Continue reading

Posted in Aboriginal, Constitutional, Supreme Court of Canada | Comments Off on Interpreting Section 15(2) of the Charter: LEAF’s Intervention in Alberta (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development) v Cunningham

Little Salmon and the juridical nature of the duty to consult and accommodate

PDF version: Little Salmon and the juridical nature of the duty to consult and accommodate  Case commented on: Beckman v Little/Salmon Carmacks First Nation, 2010 SCC 53 This is the first decision of the Supreme Court of Canada to deal … Continue reading

Posted in Aboriginal, Supreme Court of Canada | Comments Off on Little Salmon and the juridical nature of the duty to consult and accommodate

The Supreme Court of Canada clarifies the role of administrative tribunals in discharging the duty to consult

PDF version: The Supreme Court of Canada clarifies the role of administrative tribunals in discharging the duty to consult  Case considered: Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, 2010 SCC 43 In the 1950s British Columbia authorized Alcan … Continue reading

Posted in Aboriginal, Administrative Law, Energy | 5 Comments