Category Archives: Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court

JSS Barristers and The New Rules of Court

Posted on June 20, 2011 by Admin

ABlawg readers may have noticed that we have not posted any comments lately on the new Alberta Rules of Court, Alta. Reg. 124/2010. We have decided to leave that task to our colleagues at JSS Barristers, who released the first … Continue reading →

Posted in Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court | Comments Off on JSS Barristers and The New Rules of Court

New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 5.41 and Medical Examinations

Posted on April 4, 2011 by Admin

Case commented on: Nystrom v. Ranson, 2011 ABQB 116 The Plaintiff alleged physical injuries resulting from a motor vehicle accident. He claimed that his physical injuries limited his present and future vocational options and claimed past and future lost income. … Continue reading →

Posted in Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court | Comments Off on New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 5.41 and Medical Examinations

New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 13.7 and Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Posted on April 4, 2011 by Admin

Case commented on: Terrace Consulting Inc. v. Jackson, 2011 ABQB 108 The Plaintiff applied for summary judgment to enforce its remedies under an offer to purchase a condominium. The Defendants alleged misrepresentation and contended that they were told they were … Continue reading →

Posted in Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court | Comments Off on New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 13.7 and Fraudulent Misrepresentation

New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 1.2, The Purpose and Intent of the Rules and Rule 15.12, Transitional

Posted on March 29, 2011 by Admin

Case commented on: Lameman v Alberta, 2011 ABQB 40 Alberta and Canada brought applications under the old Rules to strike the plaintiffs’ statement of claim in the summer of 2009. The matter has been in case management for over two … Continue reading →

Posted in Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court | 1 Comment

New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 2.10 and Intervenor Status

Posted on March 23, 2011 by Admin

Case commented on: R. v. Hirsekorn, 2011 ABQB 156 R. v. Hirsekorn is a summary conviction appeal of convictions for shooting wildlife not in regular season and being in possession of wildlife without a valid permit, contrary to ss. 25(1) … Continue reading →

Posted in Aboriginal, Civil Procedure: New Rules of Court | Comments Off on New Rules of Court Interpreted: Rule 2.10 and Intervenor Status