Category Archives: Vexatious Litigants
A Rather Quick Response to a Rather Typical Vexatious Litigant
PDF version: A Rather Quick Response to a Rather Typical Vexatious Litigant Case commented on: Onischuk v Alberta, 2013 ABQB 89. The prominent September 2012 decision of Court of Queen’s Bench Associate Chief Justice John D. Rooke in Meads v … Continue reading
What has Meads v Meads wrought?
PDF version: What has Meads v Meads wrought? Cases commented on: R v Duncan, 2013 ONCJ 160 (CanLII); R v Tyskerud, 2013 BCPC 27 (CanLII); Cassa v The Queen, 2013 TCC 43 (CanLII); R v Martin, 2012 NSPC 115 (CanLII); R … Continue reading
The Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument (OPCA) Litigant Case
PDF version: The Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument (OPCA) Litigant Case Case Commented on: Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 This decision by Associate Chief Justice John D. Rooke was the subject of much media attention when it was released. That … Continue reading
Refining Vexatious Litigant and Vexatious Spokesperson Jurisprudence
Case considered: Allen v Gray, 2012 ABQB 66 PDF version: Refining Vexatious Litigant and Vexatious Spokesperson Jurisprudence Alberta’s new vexatious litigant provisions have been in force for almost five years now and a useful body of precedent has been developed. Novel points … Continue reading
Is this the end of an “endless repetition of failed litigation” – at least in Alberta?
PDF version: Is this the end of an “endless repetition of failed litigation” – at least in Alberta? Case considered: Karaha Bodas Company, L.L.C. v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara, 2011 ABCA 291 The Court of Appeal waxes … Continue reading
