Cases Considered
Links
Other Blogs
Recent Comments
- Linda McKay-Panos on One Person, Two Universities, Three Alberta Cases
- Susan Wright on The Role of the “Noble Savage” in Environmental Social Activism
- Matt Langer on Section 19 of the Perpetuities Act and the oil and gas lease as a fee simple determinable estate of a profit à prendre
- Jennifer Koshan on Condominiums, Caregivers and Human Rights
- J.S. on Managed property, the reserve fund, ultra vires doctrine and other issues in interpreting the Condominium Property Act
Contributors
- Admin
- Alastair Lucas, Q.C.
- Alastair MacKinnon
- Alice Woolley
- Allan Ingelson
- Amanda Winters
- Ana Maria Radu
- Anne Stalker
- Arlene Blake
- Arlene Kwasniak
- Astrid Kalkbrenner
- Ben Seward
- Brett Code, Q.C.
- Brian Seaman
- Bryce Tingle
- Carmen Gustafson
- Carol Burgess
- Cliff Shaw, Q.C.
- Colleen Ma
- David Corry
- David Laidlaw
- Donald MacCannell
- Dorab Colah
- Doug Rae
- Elizabeth Whitsitt
- Emma McAuliffe
- Geoff Ellwand
- Greg Francis
- Greg Hagen
- Heather Beyko
- Ian Holloway
- Jassmine Girgis
- Jeff Bone
- Jennifer Koshan
- Jocelyn Stacey
- Jonnette Watson Hamilton
- Joshua Selby
- Kathleen Ganley
- Kathleen Mahoney
- Kristy Williams
- Kristyn Stevens
- Linda McKay-Panos
- Martin Kay Q.C.
- Martin Kratz
- Matthew Ducharme
- Maureen Duffy
- Melissa Luhtanen
- Michael Ilg
- Nelson Medeiros
- Nicholas Rafferty
- Nickie Vlavianos
- Nigel Bankes
- Ola Malik
- Orlagh O'Kelly
- Rob Omura
- Scott Leigh
- Shaun Fluker
- Theresa Yurkewich
- TUCFA
- Will Randall
- William Donahue
Categories
Archives
Contact ABlawg
Controls
Monthly Archives: September 2011
What does the term “oil well rights” mean when used in a will?
PDF version: What does the term “oil well rights” mean when used in a will? Case considered: Wernicke v Quirk, 2011 SKCA 95 The moral of this story might well be “don’t mess with terms you don’t understand”; and if … Continue reading
Posted in Oil & Gas, Wills and Estates
Leave a comment
Failing to Assess the Key Issue: The Unsatisfactory Approval Process for Keystone XL
PDF version: Failing to Assess the Key Issue: The Unsatisfactory Approval Process for Keystone XL Decision considered: United States Department of State Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Keystone XL … Continue reading
Posted in Environmental, Oil & Gas
1 Comment
Another step in implementing ALSA: the review and variance provisions and compensation for compensable takings
PDF version: Another step in implementing ALSA: the review and variance provisions and compensation for compensable takings Regulation commented on: Alberta Land Stewardship Regulation, Alta. Reg. 179/2011 The Alberta Land Stewardship Act, SA 2009, c A-26.8 (ALSA) is a work … Continue reading
Posted in Environmental
Leave a comment
Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench finds Personal Information Protection Act, Regulations, section 7 Unconstitutional
PDF version: Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench finds Personal Information Protection Act, Regulations, section 7 Unconstitutional Decision considered: United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401 v Alberta, 2011 ABQB 415 (“UFCW“) This decision is interesting because it illustrates the interplay … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional
Leave a comment
Production in meaningful quantities: commercial realities should inform the interpretation of an oil and gas lease
PDF version: Production in meaningful quantities: commercial realities should inform the interpretation of an oil and gas lease Case commented on: Omers Energy Inc. v Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board), 2011 ABCA 251 In important and rare “reasons for judgement … Continue reading
Posted in Oil & Gas
Leave a comment
Conflicts of Interest and Good Judgment
PDF version: Conflicts of Interest and Good Judgment Case considered: Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v Nova Chemicals Corporation, 2011 ABQB 509 Previously on ABlawg I have suggested that outcomes in conflicts cases turn more on a judge’s overall impression of … Continue reading
The Elephant in the Courtroom
PDF version: The Elephant in the Courtroom Case Considered: Reece v Edmonton (City), 2011 ABCA 238 In March 2011 the Court of Appeal heard an appeal by Zoocheck Canada, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and Tove Reece (collectively … Continue reading


