-
Recent Posts
Contributors
Categories
Category Archives: Constitutional
Preliminary Thoughts on the Implications of the Children, Youth and Families Reference for the Lands Reserved Head of Section 91(24)
By: Nigel Bankes Case Commented on: Reference re An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families, 2024 SCC 5 (CanLII). PDF Version: Preliminary Thoughts on the Implications of the Children, Youth and Families Reference for the … Continue reading
Posted in Aboriginal, Constitutional, Indigenous
Comments Off on Preliminary Thoughts on the Implications of the Children, Youth and Families Reference for the Lands Reserved Head of Section 91(24)
Seismic Shift: The Notwithstanding Clause and Litigation on the Rights of Trans and Gender Diverse Youth
By: Jennifer Koshan Case Commented On: UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity v Government of Saskatchewan, 2024 SKKB 23 (CanLII) PDF Version: Seismic Shift: The Notwithstanding Clause and Litigation on the Rights of Trans and Gender Diverse Youth … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional, Human Rights, Provincial Court, Youth and the Law
Comments Off on Seismic Shift: The Notwithstanding Clause and Litigation on the Rights of Trans and Gender Diverse Youth
An Open Letter to Premier Danielle Smith Re: “Preserving choice for children and youth” Announcement
Matter Commented On: Government of Alberta, News Release, “Preserving choice for children and youth” (1 February 2024) PDF Version: An Open Letter to Premier Danielle Smith Re: “Preserving choice for children and youth” Announcement Editor’s Note: This post is a … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional, Equality, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, Youth and the Law
Comments Off on An Open Letter to Premier Danielle Smith Re: “Preserving choice for children and youth” Announcement
Online Age Verification is Crucial and Bill S-210 Gets It Wrong
By: Emily B. Laidlaw Matter Commented On: Bill S-210, An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, 1st Sess, 44th Parl, 2021. PDF Version: Online Age Verification is Crucial and Bill S-210 Gets It Wrong Age … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional, Internet Law
Comments Off on Online Age Verification is Crucial and Bill S-210 Gets It Wrong
What Does La Rose Tell Us About Climate Change Litigation in Canada?
By: Nigel Bankes, Jennifer Koshan, Jonnette Watson Hamilton, and Martin Olszynski Case Commented On: La Rose v Canada, 2023 FCA 241 (CanLII) PDF Version: What Does La Rose Tell Us About Climate Change Litigation in Canada? The last decade has … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional, Environmental, Equality
Comments Off on What Does La Rose Tell Us About Climate Change Litigation in Canada?