Author: Shaun Fluker Page 1 of 38

B.Comm. (Alberta), LL.B. (Victoria), LL.M. (Calgary).
Associate Professor.
Please click here for more information.

PDF Version: Grading the 2023 AER Liability Management Performance Report

On December 5, 2024 the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) published the 2023 Liability Management Performance Report (2023 Report). This is the second AER Liability Management Performance Report to the public on progress to reduce Alberta’s massive unfunded closure liability in the conventional (non-oil sands) oil and gas sector. We gave the 2022 Liability Management Performance Report a failing grade here because it offered little in relation to understanding whether industry performance was adequate and almost nothing at all about the AER’s performance. We note with disappointment that the AER has apparently removed the 2022 Report from its website, since historical comparison is also a method of measuring performance. The 2023 Report receives a slight improvement to a D grade because of enhanced data transparency, but the AER continues to offer little in terms of measuring effectiveness and performance in the administration of liability management.

AER declines request for an Environmental Impact Assessment of the Pathways Project

By Shaun Fluker

On December 23, 2024

In Environmental

By: Nicole Achtymichuk and Shaun Fluker

Matter Commented On: Letter Decision by AER re: EIA of Pathways Alliance Carbon Capture and Storage Hub (25 October 2024)

PDF Version: AER declines request for an Environmental Impact Assessment of the Pathways Project

The Pathways Alliance Carbon Capture and Storage Hub (Pathways Project) is set to be one of the largest carbon capture and storage projects globally. In late October, the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) decided that the Pathways Project would not be required to undergo a provincial environmental assessment under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act, RSA 2000, c E-12 (EPEA). The AER’s decision highlights how Alberta’s largely discretionary approach to environmental assessments under EPEA, which has not been substantively updated since its enactment in 1993, is inadequate to properly and transparently assess the effects of new and emerging major technologies. This post argues that the legislation should be amended to require a transparent assessment for new forms of major projects with potentially significant environmental, social, economic, and cultural consequences. The undertaking of a comprehensive provincial impact assessment on major projects such as the Pathways Project would also help avoid an application of the federal impact assessment process under the Impact Assessment Act, SC 2019, c 28, s 1 (IAA) for projects wholly within the province.

UCP Grievance and Culture-War Politics Enter Schools

By Shaun Fluker

On November 28, 2024

In Law Reform, Youth and the Law

By: Shaun Fluker and JD Students in the Public Interest Law Clinic

Bill Commented On: Bill 27 Education Amendment Act, 2024, 1^st Sess, 31^st Leg, 2024 (passed second reading Nov 19)

PDF Version: UCP Grievance and Culture-War Politics Enter Schools

On October 31 the Minister of Education introduced Bill 27 into the Alberta Legislature with the following comments: “The bill will provide clarity, consistency, and transparency to education policies in schools across Alberta. Parents across the province want to be more involved and have a larger say in their child’s education, and we are happy to strengthen their involvement through these proposed amendments.” This is a very bland introduction for a Bill that, if passed, will amend the Education Act, SA 2012, c E-0.3, to accomplish three objectives: (1) restrict the ability of schools to implement public health emergency measures; (2) require Ministerial approval of curriculum materials on gender identity, sexual orientation, and human sexuality; and (3) restrict the liberty of youth to use gender affirming names or pronouns in school. Bill 27 also grants a lot more than just a ‘larger say’ to parents – the amendments to the Education Act in the Bill grant parental control over the application of public health emergency measures, the delivery of educational materials on gender identity, sexual orientation, and human sexuality, and the use of gender affirming names or pronouns in schools. Suffice it to say, this is not what governing in the public interest looks like.

The University’s Kafkaesque Direction on Temporary Structures and Overnight Protests: “You are not supposed to see this.”

By Shaun Fluker

On November 5, 2024

In Protest

By: Jonnette Watson Hamilton and Shaun Fluker

Document Commented On: University Direction on Temporary Structures and Overnight Protests, 2024-UC-003-A, revised May 3, 2024

PDF Version: The University’s Kafkaesque Direction on Temporary Structures and Overnight Protests: “You are not supposed to see this.”

Questions about the authority exercised and the process followed by the University of Calgary when it acted on the “University Direction on Temporary Structures and Overnight Protests” (Direction) were raised in an earlier an ABlawg post on “Encampments on Campus Part 2.” As discussed in more detail in that earlier post, the Direction – identified as “2024-UC-003-A, Revised May 3, 2024” – was apparently sent to all U of C students by May 3 and handed out to pro-Palestinian protesters on campus on May 9, the same day the protesters set up their on-campus encampment and the Calgary Police Service (CPS) tore it down and forcibly removed those protesters. The Direction states that failure to follow the university’s Use of University Facilities for Non-Academic Purposes Policy (Facilities Policy) and the Direction “may constitute non-academic misconduct (students), cause for disciplinary action (staff), and/or grounds to be trespassed from the University of Calgary’s premises (all).”

The AER’s Proposed Amendments to Closure Liability Management Directives: Much Ado about Not Much

By Shaun Fluker

On November 4, 2024

In Administrative Law, Energy, Oil & Gas

By: Drew Yewchuk and Shaun Fluker

Matter Commented On: Bulletin 2024-25, Invitation for Feedback on Revised Liability Directives

PDF Version: The AER’s Proposed Amendments to Closure Liability Management Directives: Much Ado about Not Much

On 8 October 2024, the AER issued Bulletin 2024-25, Invitation for Feedback on Revised Liability Directives, announcing the AER is taking public comments on a proposal to restructure AER directives relating to the closure liability management framework. The AER’s description of the changes, and a video presentation describing the changes, are here. At a high level:

Four directives are being amended: Directive 001: Requirements for Site-Specific Liability Assessments; Directive 011: Estimated Liability (previously Licensee Liability Rating (LLR) Program: Updated Industry Parameters and Liability Costs); Directive 068: Security Deposits; Directive 088: Licensee Life-Cycle Management.
Three directives are being rescinded as their contents are either being reorganized into the four amended directives or are no longer necessary: Directive 006: Licensee Liability Rating (LLR) Program; Directive 024: Large Facility Liability Management Program; Directive 075: Oilfield Waste Liability (OWL) Program.