Author: Shaun Fluker Page 1 of 36

B.Comm. (Alberta), LL.B. (Victoria), LL.M. (Calgary).
Associate Professor.
Please click here for more information.

Legislation Commented On: All-season Resorts Act, SA 2024, c A 38.5

PDF Version: The Light Goes Out at the NRCB on Major Recreational Project Reviews

At some point during the last few months of 2025, the Alberta Natural Resources Conservation Board (NRCB) seems to have erased some history on reviewing major recreation and tourism projects in Alberta, by removing from its website several recreational project review decisions the NRCB issued in the early 1990s. This became apparent to me recently, as I prepared for a media interview to discuss the application by Fortress Mountain Holdings Ltd. under the All-season Resorts Act to construct and operate a new commercial and recreational destination in Kananaskis Country at the site of the former Fortress Mountain ski area (see here for some earlier media coverage of this expansive application). This short comment critiques the All-season Resorts Act and the removal of NRCB jurisdiction over major recreational projects.

Back to School Notwithstanding the Charter

By Shaun Fluker

On October 30, 2025

In Constitutional, Education, Labour/Employment, Rule of Law, Statutory Interpretation

By: Shaun Fluker and JD students registered in the Public Interest Law Clinic

Legislation Commented On: Back to School Act, SA 2025 (full citation unavailable at publication time)

PDF Version: Back to School Notwithstanding the Charter

On Monday October 27, 2025, the Minister of Finance Nate Horner tabled Bill 2, Back to School Act, in the second session of the current Legislature, and the UCP government subsequently pushed it through all three readings of the legislative process, effectively passing it on the same day it was introduced. The Back to School Act came into force on royal assent on October 28, 2025. The Act legislates the end of the Alberta Teachers Association (ATA) strike and imposes labour terms between the Province of Alberta and the ATA for 4 years. While this alone warrants significant scrutiny, section 3 of the Act goes further and pre-emptively invokes the Charter’s notwithstanding clause (section 33), immunizing the Act from being struck because it unlawfully infringes sections 2 and 7 to 15 of the Charter. This post explains why the Back to School Act remains justiciable, which is to say, a law still amenable to judicial scrutiny.

New Standards (or is it a Book Ban?) in Alberta K-12 Schools

By Shaun Fluker

On July 15, 2025

In Administrative Law, Education, Equality, Youth and the Law

By: Shaun Fluker

Order Commented On: Ministerial Order 030/2025 (Education and Childcare)

PDF Version: New Standards (or is it a Book Ban?) in Alberta K-12 Schools

On July 4, 2025, Education and Childcare Minister Demetrios Nicolaides issued Ministerial Order 030/2025 prohibiting the inclusion of library materials with prescribed sexual content in K-12 schools. The Minister’s statement that this is about school standards and not a book ban, as reported by CBC News here, is simply not reconcilable with the written terms of his Order, as explained in this post.

Recent Developments on Protection of Critical Habitat under the Species at Risk Act and Implications for Coal in Alberta

By Shaun Fluker

On July 7, 2025

In Environmental, Natural Resources

By: Shaun Fluker and Drew Yewchuk

Decisions Commented on: Federation of Nova Scotia Naturalists v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change), 2025 FC 983; Kebaowek First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 FC 472

PDF Version: Recent Developments on Protection of Critical Habitat under the Species at Risk Act and Implications for Coal in Alberta

This post briefly summarizes two recent federal court decisions relating to critical habitat under the Species at Risk Act, SC 2002, c 29 (SARA). These decisions add to a long list of federal court decisions adjudicating the interpretation of SARA provisions, resulting from litigation initiated by environmental non-government organizations (ENGOs) seeking judicial orders that force federal Ministers to interpret SARA in accordance with its purpose, implement SARA without undue delay, or frankly take any measures whatsoever under SARA to protect listed species at risk and their critical habitat (ABlawg has commented on many of these decisions, see for example two 2024 posts written by Drew Yewchuk here and here). Federal officials have impaired the effectiveness of SARA with peculiar interpretations that obstruct the application of legislation’s protection measures for species at risk. While the two decisions commented on here relate to species at risk in Ontario and Nova Scotia, both decisions will impact the application of SARA in Alberta and likely have implications for coal exploration and development along the Eastern Slopes of the Rocky Mountains and UCP government’s policy push to open up the Eastern Slopes to coal under the coal industry modernization initiative.

Need for Law Reform: Residential Tenancies and Late Fees

By Shaun Fluker

On April 30, 2025

In Landlord/Tenant

By: Shaun Fluker and JD students with the Public Interest Law Clinic

Legislation Commented On: Residential Tenancies Act, SA 2004, c R-17.1

PDF Version: Need for Law Reform: Residential Tenancies and Late Fees

The Public Interest Law Clinic has an ongoing law reform project file on residential tenancies. During the Fall 2024 and Winter 2025 semesters, the Clinic conducted legal research on fees payable for late payment of rent. The Alberta Law Reform Institute is undertaking a review of the Residential Tenancies Act, SA 2004, c R-17.1. The Clinic’s research confirms legislative amendments would help to clarify the enforceability of fees charged by a landlord for the late payment of rent.