Water Law – Page 4

After 18 consecutive hours of steamed debate Alberta Legislature passed Bill 2, the Responsible Energy Development Act, (REDA) into law on November 21^st, 2012 (see Calgary Herald, 11-21-2012, here). The Bill received Royal Assent on December 10^th, and except for some exceptions, comes into force on Proclamation (REDA, s 113). The ABlawg has distilled much of the Bill in its numerous discussions posted on Bill 2 (see posts under the category Responsible Energy Development Act here) and will continue its stream of comments on the REDA. This ABlawg post navigates some of the actual and potential impacts of the REDA on water management in the Province under the Water Act, RSA 2000, c W-3 (canlii), one of the “specified enactments” under the REDA. As will be seen, subject to forthcoming regulations, there could be a deluge of potential impacts, that could, unless the regulations are very clear, circumscribed, and publicized, obfuscate water management and perplex water users and the public.

Court of Appeal approves decision concluding that water rights did not pass with a transfer of land

By Nigel Bankes

On November 7, 2012

In Property, Water Law

PDF version: Court of Appeal approves decision concluding that water rights did not pass with a transfer of land

Cases Considered: Canada Finance Corporation Limited v Hirsche Herefords, 2012 ABCA 315

The Court of Appeal has dismissed the appeal from a decision of Justice Strekaf in which she had approved the sale by the receiver of a water right separate from the sale of lands to which the water right was appurtenant. In an earlier ABlawg post I commented on Justice Strekaf’s decision (here).

Access to Justice: University of Calgary Environmental Law Clinic in 2011/2012 – “What’s legal is not always what is just” – Rick Collier

By Shaun Fluker

On August 20, 2012

In Administrative Law, Environmental, Intervenors and Standing, Water Law

PDF version: Access to Justice: University of Calgary Environmental Law Clinic in 2011/2012 – “What’s legal is not always what is just” – Rick Collier

Case and Decision considered: Kelly v Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board), 2012 ABCA 19,

Hohloch v Director, Southern Region, Environmental Management, Alberta Environment and Water, re: Eastern Irrigation District (29 March 2012), (AEAB), Appeal No 10-043-ID2

As the Fall 2012 term approaches we here at the law school have started to prepare for the return of students and the resumption of lectures. In my case, this includes getting ready for another year of supervising our environmental law clinic. Before the new term arrives for the clinic, however, I want to look back on some highlights from 2011/2012. The clinic allows one to step out of the law school and into the field of environmental disputes in Alberta. If there was a common theme to all of our files last year, it was access to justice. I’ve chosen to end this recap with a tribute to Rick Collier who stood up for wilderness in an act of civil disobedience to protest the lack of public input into resource and environmental decision-making in Alberta.

The severance of a water right from a purchase and sale of land

By Nigel Bankes

On February 7, 2012

In Property, Water Law

PDF version: The severance of a water right from a purchase and sale of land

Case commented on: Royal Bank of Canada v Hirsche Herefords, 2012 ABQB 32

This decision concludes that a provincial water licence can be contingently severed from the land or undertaking to which it is appurtenant by way of an agreement of sale and the subsequent registered transfer. The contingency is the Director’s approval of the transfer of the water licence to another party under the terms of sections 81 – 82 of the Water Act, RSA 2000, c W-5. The decision also confirms the emergence of a water rights market in southern Alberta.

The legal status of the commitment by Alberta’s irrigation districts to share the shortage

By Nigel Bankes

On April 1, 2011

In Water Law

PDF version: The legal status of the commitment by Alberta’s irrigation districts to share the shortage

Document commented on: Declaration re: Sharing Water for Human Needs and Livestock Sustenance During Water Shortages, Alberta Irrigation Projects Association

Last week, on World Water Day, March 22, Alberta’s thirteen irrigation districts (acting through the Alberta Irrigation Projects Association) passed a declaration entitled “Sharing Water for Human Needs and Livestock Sustenance During Water Shortages”. The Declaration is an important political statement by Alberta’s Irrigation Districts. The purpose of this blog is to assess the legal significance of the Declaration. Before doing that I will set out the Declaration and explain just what it is that the Declaration is trying to do.

Category: Water Law Page 4 of 6

The Responsible Energy Development Act and the Water Act – cloudy confluences

Court of Appeal approves decision concluding that water rights did not pass with a transfer of land

Access to Justice: University of Calgary Environmental Law Clinic in 2011/2012 – “What’s legal is not always what is just” – Rick Collier

The severance of a water right from a purchase and sale of land

The legal status of the commitment by Alberta’s irrigation districts to share the shortage