Search Results for: jackpine

Environmental Laws as Decision-Making Processes (or, Why I am Grateful for Environmental Groups this Earth Day)

Posted on April 22, 2015 by Martin Olszynski

By: Martin Olszynski     PDF Version: Environmental Laws as Decision-Making Processes (or, Why I am Grateful for Environmental Groups this Earth Day)              Event commented on: Earth Day This past weekend, as part of the Canadian Institute for Resource Law’s “Saturday Morning at … Continue reading →

Posted in Environmental | 2 Comments

ABlawg: The Year in Review

Posted on December 15, 2014 by Admin

PDF Version: ABlawg: The Year in Review It is the time of year for making lists, and at ABlawg we have decided to put together a compilation of our highlights from 2014. It is also the season for the Canadian … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ABlawg: The Year in Review

Whose (Pipe)line is it Anyway?

Posted on December 3, 2014 by Martin Olszynski

By: Martin Olszynski  PDF Version: Whose (Pipe)line is it Anyway? Document Commented On: Quebec’s Letter to TransCanada Corp. Imposing 7 Conditions on Energy East On November 18th, on the heels of a unanimous vote of non-confidence in the National Energy … Continue reading →

Posted in Constitutional, Environmental | Comments Off on Whose (Pipe)line is it Anyway?

Federal Court of Appeal Reviews CEAA “Justification” Determination for Lower Churchill Falls

Posted on September 19, 2014 by Martin Olszynski

By: Martin Olszynski PDF Version: Federal Court of Appeal Reviews CEAA “Justification” Determination for Lower Churchill Falls Case Commented On: Council of the Innu of Ekuanitshit v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FCA 189 At least three times in the course … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative Law, Environmental | Comments Off on Federal Court of Appeal Reviews CEAA “Justification” Determination for Lower Churchill Falls

To Be (Justified) or Not To Be: That is (Still) the Question

Posted on March 12, 2014 by Martin Olszynski

By: Martin Olszynski PDF Version: To Be (Justified) or Not To Be: That is (Still) the Question Document commented on: Decision Statement Issued under Section 54 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012, SC 2012, c19, for Taseko’s proposed New Prosperity … Continue reading →

Posted in Environmental | Comments Off on To Be (Justified) or Not To Be: That is (Still) the Question