Recent Health System Reforms: Sustainability Measures or a Push to Privatization?

PDF Version: Recent Health System Reforms: Sustainability Measures or a Push to Privatization?

Matter Commented On: Recent health policy changes in Alberta

Health care costs are undoubtedly a pressing policy issue, with Alberta spending an estimated $7658 per person in 2019. Since the election, the UCP has taken various steps to aggressively contain health spending. While reducing the deficit is a laudable goal, recent changes may save little money and could worsen the health of Albertans and undermine the public health care system. Continue reading →

Law Needs Feminism Because…

By: Jennifer Koshan

PDF Version: Law Needs Feminism Because…

Event Commented On: Law Needs Feminism Because, 2020 National Forum x Calgary

Law Needs Feminism Because (LNFB) is a Canadian-based collective made up of law students and legal professionals that undertakes advocacy around issues of intersectional feminism. Intersectional feminism, a term first coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw, embraces the idea that women may be disadvantaged through intersecting axes of oppression such as gender and race. LNFB advocates on issues of intersectional feminism through an annual photo campaign at law schools across the country, allowing students, faculty and staff to share their perspectives and lived experiences of disadvantage based on gender and other grounds. The University of Calgary Faculty of Law has participated in this photo campaign three times now. LNFB also holds an annual National Forum at a Canadian law school, and its fourth annual Forum is taking place in Calgary March 6 and 7, 2020. Our Faculty’s intrepid student group, the Calgary Women Studying Law Association (CWSLA), is hosting the Forum with the theme of Innovative Intersectionality. The Forum will bring together law students (and those in related disciplines) from across Canada along with legal and other professionals and members of the public more broadly.

ABlawg readers who are interested in these issues are encouraged to attend the LNFB Forum. Registration for the Forum and its many interesting workshops is available here and the schedule is available here. For those who can’t attend, ABlawg will be featuring a series of blog posts on the Forum in the weeks to come.

This post may be cited as: Jennifer Koshan, “Law Needs Feminsm Because…” (March 6, 2020), online: ABlawg, http://ablawg.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Blog_JK_LNFB.pdf

To subscribe to ABlawg by email or RSS feed, please go to http://ablawg.ca

A Lawyer’s Duty to (Sometimes) Report a Child in Need of Protection

By: Deanne Sowter

PDF Version: A Lawyer’s Duty to (Sometimes) Report a Child in Need of Protection

Everyone has an obligation to report when they have reason to believe that a child is in need of protection, including lawyers – except where that information is protected by solicitor-client privilege. If the information is confidential a lawyer is required to report it just like anyone else; but if the information is protected by solicitor-client privilege, a lawyer can only report it pursuant to an exception. The future harm exception provides a lawyer with the discretion to disclose a limited amount of qualified information to try to avert serious physical or psychological harm, or death. Continue reading →

Provincial Cabinet has prima facie “engaged in unfair and abusive delay”

By: Nigel Bankes

PDF Version: Provincial Cabinet has prima facie “engaged in unfair and abusive delay”

Case Commented On: Prosper Petroleum Ltd v Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, 2020 ABQB 127 (CanLII)

Justice Romaine’s oral decision in this matter was released on February 10 and was widely reported in the press. We now have her written memorandum of decision (February 21).

In this case Prosper applied to the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) for the approval of its Rigel oilsands project under theOil Sands Conservation Act, RSA 2000, c 0-7 (OGCA). Under section 10(3)(a) of that Act the AER may approve an oil sands project on any terms and conditions that it considers appropriate if it considers the project to be in the public interest and with “the prior authorization of the Lieutenant Governor in Council”. Continue reading →

Alberta Court of Appeal Concludes that University of Alberta is Subject to the Charter

By: Linda McKay-Panos

PDF Version: Alberta Court of Appeal Concludes that University of Alberta is Subject to the Charter

Decision Commented On: UAlberta Pro-Life v Governors of the University of Alberta, 2020 ABCA 1 (CanLII)

Once again, Alberta courts have been asked to address whether and when the Charter applies to activities at universities. There have been several ABlawg posts in the last few years that indicate there are two conflicting lines of cases across Canada. See: Context is Everything When it Comes to Charter Application to Universities, BCCA Unfortunately Chooses Not to Follow Alberta’s Lead on the Issue of Whether the Charter Applies to Universities; Does the Charter Apply to Universities? Pridgen Distinguished in U Vic Case; Face-ing the Charter’s Application on University Campuses; University Campus is not Charter-Free; and Freedom of Expression, Universities and Anti-Choice Protests. Continue reading →