Author Archives: Charlotte Dalwood

About Charlotte Dalwood

Charlotte Dalwood is a Juris Doctor student at the University of Calgary, Faculty of Law and a graduate of Yale University. Her prior publications include articles in CBC News, rabble.ca, and Sojourners. Follow her on Twitter @csdalwood and find her online at www.charlottedalwood.com

Original Powers: Reviving the Federal Disallowance Power to Combat Anti-Trans Legislation

Posted on April 23, 2024 by Charlotte Dalwood

By: Charlotte Dalwood Matters Commented On: Government of New Brunswick, Policy 713 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, (Fredricton: Government of New Brunswick, 2023); Government of Saskatchewan, Use of Preferred First Name and Pronouns by Students, (Regina: Government of Saskatchewan, 2023); … Continue reading →

Posted in Constitutional, Legal Research | Comments Off on Original Powers: Reviving the Federal Disallowance Power to Combat Anti-Trans Legislation

Original Gender: Mobilizing Charter Section 28 to Defend Trans Rights in Saskatchewan

Posted on October 6, 2023 by Charlotte Dalwood

By: Charlotte Dalwood Matter Considered: Use of Preferred First Name and Pronouns by Students, Government of Saskatchewan PDF Version: Original Gender: Mobilizing Charter Section 28 to Defend Trans Rights in Saskatchewan On October 10, 2023, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe wants … Continue reading →

Posted in Constitutional, Equality | Comments Off on Original Gender: Mobilizing Charter Section 28 to Defend Trans Rights in Saskatchewan

Anti-SLAPP Legislation and Non-Justiciable Issues: A Consideration of Hansman v Neufeld and Todsen v Morse

Posted on October 17, 2022 by Charlotte Dalwood

By: Charlotte Dalwood Cases Commented On: Hansman v Neufeld, 2021 BCCA 222 (CanLII); Todsen v Morse, 2022 BCSC 1341 (CanLII) PDF Version: Anti-SLAPP Legislation and Non-Justiciable Issues: A Consideration of Hansman v Neufeld and Todsen v Morse Earlier this year, … Continue reading →

Posted in Anti-SLAPP | Comments Off on Anti-SLAPP Legislation and Non-Justiciable Issues: A Consideration of Hansman v Neufeld and Todsen v Morse