Category: Constitutional Page 73 of 75

Vriend Ten Years Later

On May 21, 2008

In Constitutional, Human Rights, Supreme Court of Canada

By: Linda McKay-Panos

Case Commented On: Vriend v Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493

April 2, 2008 marked the 10th anniversary of the release of the SCC decision in Vriend v Alberta. This decision was remarkable in many ways. First, there were no less than 17 intervenors by the time the case reached the SCC. Our affiliated agency, the Alberta Civil Liberties Association, was one of those intervenors. The case was significant because of the remedy that was ordered by the SCC and because of the analysis that the SCC undertook in determining that sexual orientation should be included as a protected ground in Alberta’s Individual’s Rights Protection Act (“IRPA”, now called the Human Rights, Citizenship and Multiculturalism Act (“HRCMA”), R.S.A. 2000, c. H-14). It is also interesting to examine what has happened in the area of sexual orientation and human rights since this noteworthy case.

Making Noise: Loudspeaker Preaching to Homeless Leads to Contempt and Injunction

By Jennifer Koshan

On May 16, 2008

In Constitutional, Municipal Law, Remedies

Cases Considered: Pawlowski v. Calgary (City), 2008 ABQB 267

PDF Version: Making Noise: Loudspeaker Preaching to Homeless Leads to Contempt and Injunction

The Street Church Ministries (“SCM”) and its leader, Artur Pawlowski, have been active and controversial participants in Calgary’s response to homelessness for the last few years. The SCM holds religious services in downtown Calgary parks and gives away free meals to the homeless there. Pawlowski uses amplified sound during his sermons “to reach out to drug dealers, prostitutes and others who have fallen through the gaps” of Calgary society, and believes it is God’s command that he feed and provide hope for the poor (Graeme Morton and Richard Cuthbertson, “Ban on preacher’s loudspeaker upheld”, Calgary Herald, May 1, 2008, p. B7). However, use of amplified sound without a permit is banned by Calgary’s Parks and Pathways Bylaw, Bylaw No. 20M2003. While originally the City permitted the SCM to use amplified sound, after receiving noise complaints from nearby residents (including those at the Calgary Drop-In Centre) it would only permit use of the parks without amplification, although it offered to find an alternative site where such sound could be used. Pawlowski refused the offer and continued his loudspeaker preaching, leading to bylaw tickets, injunction applications, and eventually, in this most recent case, a civil contempt order.

Eviction Notice Effectively Stayed for Residents of Black Bear Crossing

By Jennifer Koshan

On April 24, 2008

In Aboriginal, Constitutional, Remedies

Cases Considered: Tsuu T’ina Nation v. Bearchief, 2008 ABCA 74

PDF Version: Eviction Notice Effectively Stayed for Residents of Black Bear Crossing

Black Bear Crossing (“BBC”) consists of 161 units on the former barracks of the Canadian Armed Forces, situated on 940 acres on the northeast corner of the Tsuu T’ina reserve. The residences have been occupied by Tsuu T’ina Band members, as well as those claiming Band membership, since Canadian Forces personnel moved out when the base was decommissioned in 1996. In 1998, four Tsuu T’ina families who had been unable to find affordable housing moved into the unoccupied residences and within a month, most of the BBC units were occupied.

Stay Of Interim Funding Denied In Language Rights Case

By Jennifer Koshan

On April 11, 2008

In Constitutional

Cases Considered: R. v. Caron, 2008 ABCA 111

PDF Version: Stay Of Interim Funding Denied In Language Rights Case

In October 2007, Gilles Caron was awarded interim costs by Mr. Justice V.O. Ouellette of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in relation to legal fees for a language rights claim (see here). This case was the subject of an earlier comment on ABlawg. On March 19, 2008, Justice Keith Ritter of the Alberta Court of Appeal denied the Crown’s application for a stay of the interim costs order pending appeal.

Provincial Court Judges’ Professional Allowances and Judicial Independence

By Alastair Lucas, Q.C.

On April 2, 2008

In Constitutional, Provincial Court

Cases Considered: Reilly v The Chief Judge of the Provincial Court of Alberta, 2008 ABCA 72,

PDF Version: Provincial Court Judges’ Professional Allowances and Judicial Independence

Provincial Court Judge John Reilly requested the approval of the Chief Judge of the Provincial Court of Alberta to use his professional allowance to attend a conference in Caux, Switzerland. The Caux conference’s focus was “Peace – Building Initiatives” and would also be attended by an Elder and three Chiefs of the Stoney Reserve. Judge Reilly’s jurisdiction includes the Stoney Reserve and he has long been interested in the administration of justice to Aboriginal peoples and the Stoney Nation in particular. All of this he set out in his request to the Chief Judge, relying upon the professional allowance established through the Provincial Court Judges and Masters in Chambers Compensation Regulation, A.R. 176/98 (“Compensation Regulation”), which reads: