Criminal – Page 31

Cases considered: R v Mack, 2012 ABCA 42, leave to appeal granted, April 11, 2013 (SCC); Métis Nation of Alberta Region 1 v Joint Review Panel, 2012 ABCA 352, leave to appeal dismissed April 11, 2013 (SCC); Fitzpatrick v Alberta College of Physical Therapists, 2012 ABCA 207, leave to appeal dismissed April 11, 2013 (SCC)

On April 11, 2013 the Supreme Court of Canada handed down leave to appeal decisions in three cases from Alberta.

Selling Drug Paraphernalia a Pithy Criminal Substance

By Linda McKay-Panos

On March 4, 2013

In Constitutional, Criminal, Municipal Law

PDF version: Selling Drug Paraphernalia a Pithy Criminal Substance

Case considered: Smith v St Albert (City), 2012 ABQB 780.

In January, 2013, Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Terry Clackson ruled that a recent St. Albert bylaw that restricted the sale of drug paraphernalia must be struck down, because the bylaw fell outside the jurisdiction of the municipality (i.e., it was ultra vires). The bylaw in this case prohibited the display or sale of more than two products from a list of banned items, including pipes, marijuana grinders or products which display an image of a marijuana leaf. Business establishments that sell these and other forms of drug paraphernalia are sometimes referred to as “bong” or “head” shops, and exist in many municipalities across Canada.

A Charter Right to Search Google TM*

By Martin Kratz

On February 27, 2013

In Constitutional, Criminal

PDF version: A Charter Right to Search Google

Decision considered: R v McKay, 2013 ABPC 13.

The Internet has transformed society in so many ways. Even the ways we find information and the sources we rely upon have been fundamentally transformed. It appears our legal systems need to adapt to this new reality.

Domestic Violence and Duress: In Search of a Contextual Approach

By Jennifer Koshan

On January 21, 2013

In Constitutional, Criminal

PDF version: Domestic Violence and Duress: In Search of a Contextual Approach

Case commented on: R v Ryan, 2013 SCC 3.

On Friday January 18, the Supreme Court released its decision in R v Ryan. In a decision written by Justices LeBel and Cromwell, the Court held that Nicole Doucet (formerly Ryan) could not avail herself of the defence of duress in circumstances where she attempted to hire someone to kill her abusive husband. This ruling followed Ms Doucet’s acquittal for counselling murder at trial, which was upheld by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. Although the Supreme Court paid some attention to Ms Doucet’s circumstances by ultimately staying the proceedings against her (with Fish, J dissenting on this point), its analysis of the defence of duress was sorely lacking in context.

When does aggressive panhandling become robbery?

By Linda McKay-Panos

On January 18, 2013

In Criminal, Human Rights

PDF version: When does aggressive panhandling become robbery?

Case commented on: R v Ajang, 2012 ABCA 364.

This case addresses the relationship between members of society who are homeless or poor, and those who are uncomfortable and/or threatened by homeless or poor people, when they are asking for money. Mr. Ajang was charged with robbery under section 343(c) of the Criminal Code, RSC 1985 c C-46, which states that everyone commits robbery who assaults a person with intent to steal. The Trial Judge (Judge P.M. McIlhargey) found Ajang guilty of assault, but acquitted him of robbery. The Crown appealed this acquittal and the matter was heard by Justices Connie Hunt, Patricia Rowbotham and Brian O’Ferrall. The Court of Appeal overturned the acquittal and found that there was sufficient evidence of an intent to steal to support a conviction for robbery.

Category: Criminal Page 31 of 39

Supreme Court Renders Leave to Appeal Decisions in Several Alberta Cases

Selling Drug Paraphernalia a Pithy Criminal Substance

A Charter Right to Search Google TM*

Domestic Violence and Duress: In Search of a Contextual Approach

When does aggressive panhandling become robbery?