University of Calgary Faculty of Law ABLawg.ca logo over mountains

Category: Law Reform Page 1 of 4

Distress for Rent in Alberta (Residential Tenancies)

By: Joe Sellman

Report Commented On: Residential Tenancies: Distress for Rent, Final Report 122

PDF Version: Distress for Rent in Alberta (Residential Tenancies)

How easy is it for a landlord to have a tenant’s personal property seized and sold without any oversight (either judicial or via the Residential Tenancy Dispute Resolution Service)?

Very! (depending on the circumstances).

A Hypothetical Scenario:

The surprise: You (the tenant) answer the door (to the unit you rent) and a bailiff presents you with some paperwork and tells you they are here to levy “distress for rent”, because you have not paid your rent. They continue to explain they are going to look around your apartment and take your personal property to satisfy the rent you owe to the landlord as well as their costs.

Your response: While you’ve never heard of distress for rent, and wonder if this is even legal, the bailiff seems legitimate. You try and offer to pay the rent now, the bailiff calls the civil enforcement agency and tells you they will only accept cash, certified cheque, bank draft, or money order. Unfortunately, none of those options are available to you right now.

You ask, “shouldn’t the landlord have to give me an opportunity to pay the rent before sending a bailiff? Shouldn’t there be advance notice?” The response is devastating, as these aren’t required for distress for rent.

The outcome: The bailiff leaves with your most valuable personal property, including electronics, jewelry, your rare stamp collection, and a few designer clothes you have. All you are left with is some paperwork saying you have 15 days to object.

It all happened so quickly, and then you remember you have a friend who is a lawyer. You give them a call, the first thing your friend says is “just refuse the bailiff entry”. You didn’t even know that was an option.

Untangling Received Law in Alberta

By: Joe Sellman

Report Commented On: Alberta Law Reform Institute, Residential Tenancies: Distress for Rent Final Report 122 (pending publication)

PDF Version: Untangling Received Law in Alberta

What would you think if I told you that Alberta has inherited legislation from England that remains in effect today, and continues to impact the state of the law in this province?

As part of the Alberta Law Reform Institute’s (ALRI) Residential Tenancies Act project, we have been working on a standalone report considering whether the remedy of distress for rent should be abolished in residential tenancies, and if not abolished whether the law should be codified (see Issue 8 and Issue 9 in Alberta Law Reform Institute, Residential Tenancies Act: General Issues, Issue Paper 6 (2025) at 52-55).

A Radical Departure: Remarks on Part II of Bill C-5 (the Building Canada Act)

By: Martin Olszynski

Matter Commented On: Part II of Bill C-5 (the Building Canada Act)

PDF Version: A Radical Departure: Remarks on Part II of Bill C-5 (the Building Canada Act)

On Tuesday, June 17th, 2025, I had the opportunity to appear before the Senate in the context of its study of Bill C-5, Part II of which contains the Building Canada Act. Professor David Wright and I provided an initial analysis of this part of Bill C-5 shortly after it was tabled. As is my regular practice, this post includes my prepared remarks, which expand on some of that earlier analysis. I have also included hyperlinks where useful. In our initial post, Professor Wright asked whether Bill C-5 will allow Canada to ‘move fast and make things’ or ‘move fast and break things’? While it is still too early to answer that question from a project review perspective (the prospects, however, appear increasingly dim), it is now clear that as drafted Bill C-5 breaks fundamental democratic norms, at the least, and that our democracy and the rule of law will be diminished for it.

UCP Grievance and Culture-War Politics Enter Schools

By: Shaun Fluker and JD Students in the Public Interest Law Clinic

Bill Commented On: Bill 27 Education Amendment Act, 2024, 1st Sess, 31st Leg, 2024 (passed second reading Nov 19)

PDF Version: UCP Grievance and Culture-War Politics Enter Schools

On October 31 the Minister of Education introduced Bill 27 into the Alberta Legislature with the following comments: “The bill will provide clarity, consistency, and transparency to education policies in schools across Alberta. Parents across the province want to be more involved and have a larger say in their child’s education, and we are happy to strengthen their involvement through these proposed amendments.” This is a very bland introduction for a Bill that, if passed, will amend the Education Act, SA 2012, c E-0.3, to accomplish three objectives: (1) restrict the ability of schools to implement public health emergency measures; (2) require Ministerial approval of curriculum materials on gender identity, sexual orientation, and human sexuality; and (3) restrict the liberty of youth to use gender affirming names or pronouns in school. Bill 27 also grants a lot more than just a ‘larger say’ to parents – the amendments to the Education Act in the Bill grant parental control over the application of public health emergency measures, the delivery of educational materials on gender identity, sexual orientation, and human sexuality, and the use of gender affirming names or pronouns in schools. Suffice it to say, this is not what governing in the public interest looks like.

Submission on Family Violence Law to the Ministers of Arts, Culture and Status of Women, Children and Family Services, and Justice

By: Jennifer Koshan, Ampee Minhas, Athina Pantazopoulos & Sasha Reid

Legislation Commented On: Family Law Act, SA 2003, c F-4.5; Protection Against Family Violence Act, RSA 2000, c P-27

PDF Version: Submission on Family Violence Law to the Ministers of Arts, Culture and Status of Women, Children and Family Services, and Justice

Authors’ Note:

This law reform submission was delivered to the Government of Alberta, Ministers of Arts, Culture and Status of Women, Children and Family Services, and Justice, on July 8, 2024. Below we provide the Introduction to the submission, a full version of which is available here.

Page 1 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén