Category Archives: Constitutional

Locating the Constitutional Guardrails on Federal Environmental Decision Making after Reference re: Impact Assessment Act

By: Nathan Murray and Martin Olszynski Decision Commented On: Reference re Impact Assessment Act, 2023 SCC 23 (CanLII) PDF Version: Locating the Constitutional Guardrails on Federal Environmental Decision Making after Reference re: Impact Assessment Act This post is the seventh ABlawg commentary … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional, Energy, Environmental, Oil & Gas | Comments Off on Locating the Constitutional Guardrails on Federal Environmental Decision Making after Reference re: Impact Assessment Act

Gender-Affirming Names and Pronouns, Parental Control, and Family Violence

By: Jennifer Koshan Policy Proposal Commented On: United Conservative Party, Annual General Meeting Policy and Governance Resolutions, Policy Resolution 8 (November 2023) PDF Version: Gender-Affirming Names and Pronouns, Parental Control, and Family Violence Content Warning: This post contains descriptions of … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional, Family, Human Rights | Comments Off on Gender-Affirming Names and Pronouns, Parental Control, and Family Violence

Religious Freedom and the Oath to the Sovereign

By: Howard Kislowicz Case Commented On: Wirring v Law Society of Alberta, 2023 ABKB 580 (CanLII) PDF Version: Religious Freedom and the Oath to the Sovereign In Wirring v Law Society of Alberta, 2023 ABKB 580 (CanLII), Justice Barbara Johnston … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional | Comments Off on Religious Freedom and the Oath to the Sovereign

Not Plenary, but Not Nothing Either: Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Supreme Court Opinion on the (un)Constitutionality of the Federal Impact Assessment Regime

By: David V. Wright Case Commented On: Reference re Impact Assessment Act, 2023 SCC 23 (CanLII) PDF Version: Not Plenary, but Not Nothing Either: Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Supreme Court Opinion on the (un)Constitutionality of the Federal Impact Assessment … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional, Environmental, Supreme Court of Canada | Comments Off on Not Plenary, but Not Nothing Either: Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Supreme Court Opinion on the (un)Constitutionality of the Federal Impact Assessment Regime

The Word “Exclusive” Does Not Confer a Constitutional Monopoly, Nor a Right to Develop Provincial Resource Projects

By: Nigel Bankes and Andrew Leach Decision Commented On: Reference re Impact Assessment Act, 2023 SCC 23 (CanLII) PDF Version: The Word “Exclusive” Does Not Confer a Constitutional Monopoly, Nor a Right to Develop Provincial Resource Projects The majority opinion of … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional, Environmental, Supreme Court of Canada | Comments Off on The Word “Exclusive” Does Not Confer a Constitutional Monopoly, Nor a Right to Develop Provincial Resource Projects